A theoretically-explained new-variant of Modified-Newtonian-Dynamics (MOND)

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Abstract

It is surprising that we hardly know only 5% of the universe. Rest of the universe is made up of 70% of dark-energy and 25% of dark-matter. Dark-energy is responsible for acceleration of the expanding universe; whereas dark-matter is said to be necessary as extra-mass of bizarre-properties to explain the anomalous rotational-velocity of galaxy. Though the existence of dark-energy has gradually been accepted in scientific community, but the candidates for dark-matter have not been found as yet and are too crazy to be accepted. Thus, it is obvious to look for an alternative theory in place of dark-matter. Israel-scientist M. Milgrom has suggested a 'Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND)' which appears to be highly successful for explaining the anomalous rotational-velocity. But unfortunately MOND lacks theoretical support. The MOND, in-fact, is (empirical) modification of Newtonian-Dynamics through modification in the kinematical acceleration term 'a' (which is normally taken as a=v2ra=\frac{v^{2}}{r}) as effective kinematic acceleration aeffective=aμ(aa0)a_{effective} = a μ(\frac{a}{a_{0}}), wherein the μμ-function is 1 for usual-values of accelerations but equals to aa0(≪1)\frac{a}{a_{0}} (\ll 1) if the acceleration 'a' is extremely-low lower than a critical value a0(10−10m/s2)a_0 (10^{-10} m/s^{2}). In the present paper, a novel variant of MOND is proposed with theoretical backing; wherein with the consideration of universe's acceleration ada_{d} due to dark-energy, a new type of μμ-function on theoretical-basis emerges out leading to aeffective=a(1−Ka0a)a_{effective} = a(1 - K \frac{a_{0}}{a}). The proposed theoretical-MOND model too is able to fairly explain qualitatively the more-or-less 'flat' velocity-curve of galaxy-rotation, and is also able to predict a dip (minimum) on the curve.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.