Paper detail

A Theoretical Analysis of the BDeu Scores in Bayesian Network Structure Learning

In Bayesian network structure learning (BNSL), we need the prior probability over structures and parameters. If the former is the uniform distribution, the latter determines the correctness of BNSL. In this paper, we compare BDeu (Bayesian Dirichlet equivalent uniform) and Jeffreys' prior w.r.t. their consistency. When we seek a parent set $U$ of a variable $X$, we require regularity that if $H(X|U)\leq H(X|U')$ and $U\subsetneq U'$, then $U$ should be chosen rather than $U'$. We prove that the BDeu scores violate the property and cause fatal situations in BNSL. This is because for the BDeu scores, for any sample size $n$,there exists a probability in the form $P(X,Y,Z)={P(XZ)P(YZ)}/{P(Z)}$ such that the probability of deciding that $X$ and $Y$ are not conditionally independent given $Z$ is more than a half. For Jeffreys' prior, the false-positive probability uniformly converges to zero without depending on any parameter values, and no such an inconvenience occurs.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.