Paper detail

A tagger for strange jets based on tracking information using long short-term memory

An algorithm for the identification of jets that originate from the hadronisation of strange quarks is presented, which complements existing algorithms for the identification of jets that originate from $b$-quarks and $c$-quarks. The algorithm is based on the properties of tracks and uses long short-term memory recurrent neural networks to discriminate between jets from strange quarks and jets from down and up quarks. The performance of the algorithm is compared to a simple benchmark algorithm that uses the transverse-momentum fraction carried by a reconstructed $K_S \rightarrow π^+π^-$ decay. While the benchmark algorithm is limited to signal efficiencies smaller than 13%, the proposed algorithm is not limited in efficiency. For signal efficiencies of 30% and 70%, background efficiencies of 21% and 63% are achieved, indicating the challenge of discriminating strange jets from jets that originate from first-generation quarks.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.