Paper detail

A Survey of Numerical Solutions to the Coagulation Equation

We present the results of a systematic survey of numerical solutions to the coagulation equation for a rate coefficient of the form A_ij \propto (i^mu j^nu + i^nu j^mu) and monodisperse initial conditions. The results confirm that there are three classes of rate coefficients with qualitatively different solutions. For nu \leq 1 and lambda = mu + nu \leq 1, the numerical solution evolves in an orderly fashion and tends toward a self-similar solution at large time t. The properties of the numerical solution in the scaling limit agree with the analytic predictions of van Dongen and Ernst. In particular, for the subset with mu > 0 and lambda < 1, we disagree with Krivitsky and find that the scaling function approaches the analytically predicted power-law behavior at small mass, but in a damped oscillatory fashion that was not known previously. For nu \leq 1 and lambda > 1, the numerical solution tends toward a self-similar solution as t approaches a finite time t_0. The mass spectrum n_k develops at t_0 a power-law tail n_k \propto k^{-tau} at large mass that violates mass conservation, and runaway growth/gelation is expected to start at t_crit = t_0 in the limit the initial number of particles n_0 -> \infty. The exponent tau is in general less than the analytic prediction (lambda + 3)/2, and t_0 = K/[(lambda - 1) n_0 A_11] with K = 1--2 if lambda > 1.1. For nu > 1, the behaviors of the numerical solution are similar to those found in a previous paper by us. They strongly suggest that there are no self-consistent solutions at any time and that runaway growth is instantaneous in the limit n_0 -> \infty. They also indicate that the time t_crit for the onset of runaway growth decreases slowly toward zero with increasing n_0.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.