Paper detail

A Survey of Document Grounded Dialogue Systems (DGDS)

Dialogue system (DS) attracts great attention from industry and academia because of its wide application prospects. Researchers usually divide the DS according to the function. However, many conversations require the DS to switch between different functions. For example, movie discussion can change from chit-chat to QA, the conversational recommendation can transform from chit-chat to recommendation, etc. Therefore, classification according to functions may not be enough to help us appreciate the current development trend. We classify the DS based on background knowledge. Specifically, study the latest DS based on the unstructured document(s). We define Document Grounded Dialogue System (DGDS) as the DS that the dialogues are centering on the given document(s). The DGDS can be used in scenarios such as talking over merchandise against product Manual, commenting on news reports, etc. We believe that extracting unstructured document(s) information is the future trend of the DS because a great amount of human knowledge lies in these document(s). The research of the DGDS not only possesses a broad application prospect but also facilitates AI to better understand human knowledge and natural language. We analyze the classification, architecture, datasets, models, and future development trends of the DGDS, hoping to help researchers in this field.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.