Paper detail

A strong law of large numbers related to multiple testing Normal means

Assessing the stability of a multiple testing procedure under dependence is important but very challenging. Even for multiple testing which among a set of Normal random variables have mean zero, which we refer to as the "Normal means problem", to date there lacks a classification of the type of dependence under which the strong law of large numbers (SLLN) holds for the numbers of rejections and false rejections. We introduce the concept of "principal correlation structure (PCS)" that characterizes the type of dependence for which such SLLN holds, and establish the law. Further, we show that PCS ensures the SLLN for the false discover proportion when there is always a positive proportion of zero Normal means. We also investigate the stability of two conditional multiple testing procedures for the Normal means problem, and show that the associated SLLN holds when in addition the decomposition of the covariance matrix of the Normal random variables that induces PCS is homogeneous in certain sense. Our results also provide a formal way to check if the "weak dependence" assumption, a widely used assumption in the multiple testing literature, holds for the Normal means problem. As by-products, we establish a universal bound on Hermite polynomials and a universal comparison result on the covariance of the indicator functions of the two p-values of testing the marginal means of a bivariate Normal random vector and the correlation between the two components of the vector. These are of their own interests.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.