Paper detail

A Statistical Framework for Efficient Monitoring of End-to-End Network Properties

Network service providers and customers are often concerned with aggregate performance measures that span multiple network paths. Unfortunately, forming such network-wide measures can be difficult, due to the issues of scale involved. In particular, the number of paths grows too rapidly with the number of endpoints to make exhaustive measurement practical. As a result, there is interest in the feasibility of methods that dramatically reduce the number of paths measured in such situations while maintaining acceptable accuracy. In previous work we proposed a statistical framework to efficiently address this problem, in the context of additive metrics such as delay and loss rate, for which the per-path metric is a sum of (possibly transformed) per-link measures. The key to our method lies in the observation and exploitation of significant redundancy in network paths (sharing of common links). In this paper we make three contributions: (1) we generalize the framework to make it more immediately applicable to network measurements encountered in practice; (2) we demonstrate that the observed path redundancy upon which our method is based is robust to variation in key network conditions and characteristics, including link failures; and (3) we show how the framework may be applied to address three practical problems of interest to network providers and customers, using data from an operating network. In particular, we show how appropriate selection of small sets of path measurements can be used to accurately estimate network-wide averages of path delays, to reliably detect network anomalies, and to effectively make a choice between alternative sub-networks, as a customer choosing between two providers or two ingress points into a provider network.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.