Paper detail

A stakeholder-oriented multi-criteria optimization model for decentral multi-energy systems

The decarbonization of municipal and district energy systems requires economic and ecologic efficient transformation strategies in a wide spectrum of technical options. Especially under the consideration of multi-energy systems, which connect energy domains such as heat and electricity supply, expansion and operational planning of so-called decentral multi-energy systems (DMES) holds a multiplicity of complexities. This motivates the use of optimization problems, which reach their limitations with regard to computational feasibility in combination with the required level of detail. With an increased focus on DMES implementation, this problem is aggravated since, moving away from the traditional system perspective, a user-centered, market-integrated perspective is assumed. Besides technical concepts it requires the consideration of market regimes, e.g. self-consumption and the broader energy sharing. This highlights the need for DMES optimization models which cover a microeconomic perspective under consideration of detailed technical options and energy regulation, in order to understand mutual technical and socio-economic and -ecologic interactions of energy policies. In this context we present a stakeholder-oriented multi-criteria optimization model for DMES, which addresses technical aspects, as well as market and services coverage towards a real-world implementation. The current work bridges a gap between the required modelling level of detail and computational feasibility of DMES expansion and operation optimization. Model detail is achieved by the application of a hybrid combination of mathematical methods in a nested multi-level decomposition approach, including a Genetic Algorithm, Benders Decomposition and Lagrange Relaxation. This also allows for distributed computation on multi-node high performance computer clusters.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.