Paper detail

A Singly-Exponential Time Algorithm for Computing Nonnegative Rank

Here, we give an algorithm for deciding if the nonnegative rank of a matrix $M$ of dimension $m \times n$ is at most $r$ which runs in time $(nm)^{O(r^2)}$. This is the first exact algorithm that runs in time singly-exponential in $r$. This algorithm (and earlier algorithms) are built on methods for finding a solution to a system of polynomial inequalities (if one exists). Notably, the best algorithms for this task run in time exponential in the number of variables but polynomial in all of the other parameters (the number of inequalities and the maximum degree). Hence these algorithms motivate natural algebraic questions whose solution have immediate {\em algorithmic} implications: How many variables do we need to represent the decision problem, does $M$ have nonnegative rank at most $r$? A naive formulation uses $nr + mr$ variables and yields an algorithm that is exponential in $n$ and $m$ even for constant $r$. (Arora, Ge, Kannan, Moitra, STOC 2012) recently reduced the number of variables to $2r^2 2^r$, and here we exponentially reduce the number of variables to $2r^2$ and this yields our main algorithm. In fact, the algorithm that we obtain is nearly-optimal (under the Exponential Time Hypothesis) since an algorithm that runs in time $(nm)^{o(r)}$ would yield a subexponential algorithm for 3-SAT . Our main result is based on establishing a normal form for nonnegative matrix factorization - which in turn allows us to exploit algebraic dependence among a large collection of linear transformations with variable entries. Additionally, we also demonstrate that nonnegative rank cannot be certified by even a very large submatrix of $M$, and this property also follows from the intuition gained from viewing nonnegative rank through the lens of systems of polynomial inequalities.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.