Paper detail

A simpler load-balancing algorithm for range-partitioned data in peer-to-peer systems

Random hashing is a standard method to balance loads among nodes in Peer-to-Peer networks. However, hashing destroys locality properties of object keys, the critical properties to many applications, more specifically, those that require range searching. To preserve a key order while keeping loads balanced, Ganesan, Bawa and Garcia-Molina proposed a load-balancing algorithm that supports both object insertion and deletion that guarantees a ratio of 4.237 between the maximum and minimum loads among nodes in the network using constant amortized costs. However, their algorithm is not straightforward to implement in real networks because it is recursive. Their algorithm mostly uses local operations with global max-min load information. In this work, we present a simple non-recursive algorithm using essentially the same primitive operations as in Ganesan {\em et al.}'s work. We prove that for insertion and deletion, our algorithm guarantees a constant max-min load ratio of 7.464 with constant amortized costs.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.