Paper detail

A simple note on some empirical stochastic process as a tool in uniform L-statistics weak laws

In this paper, we are concerned with the stochastic process \begin{equation} β_{n}(q_{t},t)=β_{n}(t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\left\{G_{t,n}(Y(t))-G_{t}(Y_{j}(t))\right\} q_{t}(Y_{j}(t)), \tag{A} \end{equation} where for $n\geq1$ and $T>0$, the sequences $\{Y_{1}(t),Y_{2}(t),...,Y_{n}(t),t\in [0,T]\}$ are independant observations of some real stochastic process ${Y(t),t\in [0,T]}$, for each $t \in [0,T]$, $G_{t}$ is the distribution function of $% Y(t)$ and $G_{t,n}$ is the empirical distribution function based on $% Y_{1}(t),Y_{2}(t),...,Y_{n}(t)$, and finally $q_{t}$ is a bounded real fonction defined on $\mathbb{R}$. This process appears when investigating some time-dependent L-Statistics which are expressed as a function of some functional empirical process and the process (A). Since the functional empirical process is widely investigated in the literature, the process reveals itself as an important key for L-Statistics laws. In this paper, we state an extended study of this process, give complete calculations of the first moments, the covariance function and find conditions for asymptotic tightness.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.