Paper detail

A simple method for improving the accuracy of Chung-Lu random graph generation

Random graph models play a central role in network analysis. The Chung-Lu model, which connects nodes based on their expected degrees is of particular interest. It is widely used to generate null-graph models with expected degree sequences as well as implicitly define network measures such as modularity. Despite its popularity, practical methods for generating instances of Chung-Lu model-based graphs do relatively poor jobs in terms of accurately realizing many degree sequences. We introduce a simple method for improving the accuracy of Chung-Lu graph generation. Our method uses a Poisson approximation to define a linear system describing the expected degree sequence to be output from the model using standard generation techniques. We then use the inverse of this system to determine an appropriate input corresponding to the desired output. We give a closed form expression for this inverse and show that it may be used to drastically reduce error for many degree distributions.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.