Paper detail

A Simple General Approach to Balance Task Difficulty in Multi-Task Learning

In multi-task learning, difficulty levels of different tasks are varying. There are many works to handle this situation and we classify them into five categories, including the direct sum approach, the weighted sum approach, the maximum approach, the curriculum learning approach, and the multi-objective optimization approach. Those approaches have their own limitations, for example, using manually designed rules to update task weights, non-smooth objective function, and failing to incorporate other functions than training losses. In this paper, to alleviate those limitations, we propose a Balanced Multi-Task Learning (BMTL) framework. Different from existing studies which rely on task weighting, the BMTL framework proposes to transform the training loss of each task to balance difficulty levels among tasks based on an intuitive idea that tasks with larger training losses will receive more attention during the optimization procedure. We analyze the transformation function and derive necessary conditions. The proposed BMTL framework is very simple and it can be combined with most multi-task learning models. Empirical studies show the state-of-the-art performance of the proposed BMTL framework.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.