Paper detail

A simple data-driven method to optimise the penalty strengths of penalised models and its application to non-parametric smoothing

Information of interest can often only be extracted from data by model fitting. When the functional form of such a model can not be deduced from first principles, one has to make a choice between different possible models. A common approach in such cases is to minimise the information loss in the model by trying to reduce the number of fit variables (or the model flexibility, respectively) as much as possible while still yielding an acceptable fit to the data. Model selection via the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) provides such an implementation of Occam's razor. We argue that the same principles can be applied to optimise the penalty-strength of a penalised maximum-likelihood model. However, while in typical applications AIC is used to choose from a finite, discrete set of maximum-likelihood models the penalty optimisation requires to select out of a continuum of candidate models and these models violate the maximum-likelihood condition. We derive a generalised information criterion AICp that encompasses this case. It naturally involves the concept of effective free parameters which is very flexible and can be applied to any model, be it linear or non-linear, parametric or non-parametric, and with or without constraint equations on the parameters. We show that the generalised AICp allows an optimisation of any penalty-strength without the need of separate Monte-Carlo simulations. As an example application, we discuss the optimisation of the smoothing in non-parametric models which has many applications in astrophysics, like in dynamical modeling, spectral fitting or gravitational lensing.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.