Paper detail

A Simple Character String Proof of the "True but Unprovable" Version of Gödel's First Incompleteness Theorem

A rather easy yet rigorous proof of a version of Gödel's first incompleteness theorem is presented. The version is "each recursively enumerable theory of natural numbers with 0, 1, +, *, =, logical and, logical not, and the universal quantifier either proves a false sentence or fails to prove a true sentence". The proof proceeds by first showing a similar result on theories of finite character strings, and then transporting it to natural numbers, by using them to model strings and their concatenation. Proof systems are expressed via Turing machines that halt if and only if their input string is a theorem. This approach makes it possible to present all but one parts of the proof rather briefly with simple and straightforward constructions. The details require some care, but do not require significant background knowledge. The missing part is the widely known fact that Turing machines can perform complicated computational tasks.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.