BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Antti Valmari

Antti Valmari contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer ScienceComputational ComplexityFormal Languages and Automata Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

The Inconsistent Labelling Problem of Stutter-Preserving Partial-Order Reduction

In model checking, partial-order reduction (POR) is an effective technique to reduce the size of the state space. Stubborn sets are an established variant of POR and have seen many applications over the past 31 years. One of the early works on stubborn sets shows that a combination of several conditions on the reduction is sufficient to preserve stutter trace equivalence, making stubborn sets suitable for model checking of linear-time properties. In this paper, we identify a flaw in the reasoning and show with a counter-example that stutter trace equivalence is not necessarily preserved. We propose a solution together with an updated correctness proof. Furthermore, we analyse in which formalisms this problem may occur. The impact on practical implementations is limited, since they all compute a correct approximation of the theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A Simple Character String Proof of the "True but Unprovable" Version of Gödel's First Incompleteness Theorem

A rather easy yet rigorous proof of a version of Gödel's first incompleteness theorem is presented. The version is "each recursively enumerable theory of natural numbers with 0, 1, +, *, =, logical and, logical not, and the universal quantifier either proves a false sentence or fails to prove a true sentence". The proof proceeds by first showing a similar result on theories of finite character strings, and then transporting it to natural numbers, by using them to model strings and their concatenation. Proof systems are expressed via Turing machines that halt if and only if their input string is a theorem. This approach makes it possible to present all but one parts of the proof rather briefly with simple and straightforward constructions. The details require some care, but do not require significant background knowledge. The missing part is the widely known fact that Turing machines can perform complicated computational tasks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Asymptotic Proportion of Hard Instances of the Halting Problem

Although the halting problem is undecidable, imperfect testers that fail on some instances are possible. Such instances are called hard for the tester. One variant of imperfect testers replies "I don't know" on hard instances, another variant fails to halt, and yet another replies incorrectly "yes" or "no". Also the halting problem has three variants: does a given program halt on the empty input, does a given program halt when given itself as its input, or does a given program halt on a given input. The failure rate of a tester for some size is the proportion of hard instances among all instances of that size. This publication investigates the behaviour of the failure rate as the size grows without limit. Earlier results are surveyed and new results are proven. Some of them use C++ on Linux as the computational model. It turns out that the behaviour is sensitive to the details of the programming language or computational model, but in many cases it is possible to prove that the proportion of hard instances does not vanish.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access