Paper detail

A sharper threshold for random groups at density one-half

In the density model of random groups, we consider presentations with any fixed number m of generators and many random relators of length l, sending l to infinity. If d is a &#34;density&#34; parameter measuring the rate of exponential growth of the number of relators compared to the length of relators, then many group-theoretic properties become generically true or generically false at different values of d. The signature theorem for this density model is a phase transition from triviality to hyperbolicity: for d < 1/2, random groups are a.a.s. infinite hyperbolic, while for d > 1/2, random groups are a.a.s. order one or two. We study random groups at the density threshold d = 1/2. Kozma had found that trivial groups are generic for a range of growth rates at d = 1/2; we show that infinite hyperbolic groups are generic in a different range. (We include an exposition of Kozma&#39;s previously unpublished argument, with slightly improved results, for completeness.)

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.