Paper detail

A Sharp Upper Bound for the Complexity of Labeled Oriented Trees

A labeled oriented graph (LOG) is an oriented graph with a labeling function from the edge set into the vertex set. The complexity of a LOG is the minimal cardinality of an initial set $S$ of vertices such that every vertex can be reached successively from $S$ only using edges with labels in $S$ or already visited vertices. We give a constructive proof of a conjecture by Rosebrock stating that for an interior reduced, connected LOG with $m$ vertices the complexity is at most $(m+1) / 2$ and show that this bound is sharp. Due to results of Howie labeled oriented trees (LOTs) yield crucial candidates for counterexamples of the Whitehead Conjecture stating that every subcomplex of an aspherical 2-complex is aspherical. We explicitly describe the structure of LOTs of maximal complexity $(m+1)/2$. We conclude that the 2-complexes associated to these LOTs are always aspherical excluding them from the list of possible counterexamples.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.