Paper detail

A scaling law beyond Zipf's law and its relation to Heaps' law

The dependence with text length of the statistical properties of word occurrences has long been considered a severe limitation quantitative linguistics. We propose a simple scaling form for the distribution of absolute word frequencies which uncovers the robustness of this distribution as text grows. In this way, the shape of the distribution is always the same and it is only a scale parameter which increases linearly with text length. By analyzing very long novels we show that this behavior holds both for raw, unlemmatized texts and for lemmatized texts. For the latter case, the word-frequency distribution is well fit by a double power law, maintaining the Zipf's exponent value $γ\simeq 2$ for large frequencies but yielding a smaller exponent in the low frequency regime. The growth of the distribution with text length allows us to estimate the size of the vocabulary at each step and to propose an alternative to Heaps' law, which turns out to be intimately connected to Zipf's law, thanks to the scaling behavior.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.