Paper detail

A Scalable Actor-based Programming System for PGAS Runtimes

The PGAS model is well suited for executing irregular applications on cluster-based systems, due to its efficient support for short, one-sided messages. However, there are currently two major limitations faced by PGAS applications. The first relates to scalability: despite the availability of APIs that support non-blocking operations in special cases, many PGAS operations on remote locations are synchronous by default, which can lead to long-latency stalls and poor scalability. The second relates to productivity: while it is simpler for the developer to express all communications at a fine-grained granularity that is natural to the application, experiments have shown that such a natural expression results in performance that is 20x slower than more efficient but less productive code that requires manual message aggregation and termination detection. In this paper, we introduce a new programming system for PGAS applications, in which point-to-point remote operations can be expressed as fine-grained asynchronous actor messages. In this approach, the programmer does not need to worry about programming complexities related to message aggregation and termination detection. Our approach can also be viewed as extending the classical Bulk Synchronous Parallelism model with fine-grained asynchronous communications within a phase or superstep. We believe that our approach offers a desirable point in the productivity-performance space for PGAS applications, with more scalable performance and higher productivity relative to past approaches. Specifically, for seven irregular mini-applications from the Bale benchmark suite executed using 2048 cores in the NERSC Cori system, our approach shows geometric mean performance improvements of >=20x relative to standard PGAS versions (UPC and OpenSHMEM) while maintaining comparable productivity to those versions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.