Paper detail

A Robust Quantitative Comparison Criterion of Two Signals based on the Sobolev Norm of Their Difference

In this manuscript we present a method for the quantitative comparison of two surfaces, applicable to temporal and/or spatial extent in one or two dimensions. Often surface comparisons are simply overlaid graphs of results from different methodologies that are qualitative at best; it is the purpose of this work to facilitate quantitative evaluation. The surfaces can be analytical, numerical, and/or experimental, and the result returned by the method, termed surface similarity parameter or normalized error, has been normalized so that its value lies between zero and one. When the parameter has a value of zero, the surfaces are in perfect agreement, whereas a value of one is indicative of perfect disagreement. To provide insight regarding the magnitude of the parameter, several canonical cases are presented, followed by results from breaking water wave experimental measurements with numerical simulations, and by a comparison of a prescribed, periodic, square-wave surface profile and the subsequent manufactured surface.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.