Paper detail

A robust covariance testing approach for high-throughput data

The problem of testing changes in covariance has received increasing attention in recent years, especially in the context of high-dimensional testing. A number of approaches have been proposed, all limited to the two-sample problem and involving varying statistics and assumptions on the number of features $p$ vs. the sample size $n$. There are no general approaches to test association of covariances with a continuous outcome. We propose a uniform framework for testing association of covariances with an experimental variable, whether discrete or continuous. The approach is not limited by the data dimensions. Our test procedure (i) does not rely on parametric assumptions, (ii) works well for a range of $p$ and $n$ (e.g., does not require $n > p$), (iii) provides correct type I error control, and (iv) includes four different statistics, to ensure power and flexibility under various settings, including a new "connectivity" statistic that is sensitive to changes in overall covariance magnitude. We demonstrate that, for the two-sample special case, the proposed statistics are permutationally equivalent or similar to existing proposed statistics. We demonstrate the power and utility of our approaches via simulation and analysis of real data. The approach is implemented in an $R$ package.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.