Paper detail

A review of Monte Carlo-based versions of the EM algorithm

The EM algorithm is a powerful tool for maximum likelihood estimation with missing data. In practice, the calculations required for the EM algorithm are often intractable. We review numerous methods to circumvent this intractability, all of which are based on Monte Carlo simulation. We focus our attention on the Monte Carlo EM (MCEM) algorithm and its various implementations. We also discuss some related methods like stochastic approximation and Monte Carlo maximum likelihood. Generating the Monte Carlo samples necessary for these methods is, in general, a hard problem. As such, we review several simulation strategies which can be used to address this challenge. Given the wide range of methods available for approximating the EM, it can be challenging to select which one to use. We review numerous comparisons between these methods from a wide range of sources, and offer guidance on synthesizing the findings. Finally, we give some directions for future research to fill important gaps in the existing literature on the MCEM algorithm and related methods.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.