Paper detail

A Remark on the Assumptions of Bayes' Theorem

We formulate simple equivalent conditions for the validity of Bayes' formula for conditional densities. We show that for any random variables X and Y (with values in arbitrary measurable spaces), the following are equivalent: 1. X and Y have a joint density w.r.t. a product measure μx ν, 2. P_{X,Y} << P_X x P_Y, (here P_{.} denotes the distribution of {.}) 3. X has a conditional density p(x | y) w.r.t. a sigma-finite measure μ, 4. X has a conditional distribution P_{X|Y} such that P_{X|y} << P_X for all y, 5. X has a conditional distribution P_{X|Y} and a marginal density p(x) w.r.t. a measure μsuch that P_{X|y} << μfor all y. Furthermore, given random variables X and Y with a conditional density p(y | x) w.r.t. νand a marginal density p(x) w.r.t. μ, we show that Bayes' formula p(x | y) = p(y | x)p(x) / \int p(y | x)p(x)dμ(x) yields a conditional density p(x | y) w.r.t. μif and only if X and Y satisfy the above conditions. Counterexamples illustrating the nontriviality of the results are given, and implications for sequential adaptive estimation are considered.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.