Paper detail

A Refined QSO Selection Method Using Diagnostics Tests: 663 QSO Candidates in the LMC

We present 663 QSO candidates in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) selected using multiple diagnostics. We started with a set of 2,566 QSO candidates from our previous work selected using time variability of the MACHO LMC lightcurves. We then obtained additional information for the candidates by crossmatching them with the Spitzer SAGE, the MACHO UBVI, the 2MASS, the Chandra and the XMM catalogs. Using this information, we specified six diagnostic features based on mid-IR colors, photometric redshifts using SED template fitting, and X-ray luminosities in order to further discriminate high confidence QSO candidates in the absence of spectra information. We then trained a one-class SVM (Support Vector Machine) model using the diagnostics features of the confirmed 58 MACHO QSOs. We applied the trained model to the original candidates and finally selected 663 high confidence QSO candidates. Furthermore, we crossmatched these 663 QSO candidates with the newly confirmed 144 QSOs and 275 non-QSOs in the LMC fields. On the basis of the counterpart analysis, we found that the false positive rate is less than 1%.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.