Paper detail

A random-walk benchmark for single-electron circuits

Mesoscopic integrated circuits achieving high-fidelity control of elementary quantum systems require new methodology for benchmarking. We offer circuit-level statistical description of rare-error accumulation in terms of a universal random-walk model for on-demand electron transfer. For a high-fidelity single-electron circuit, realized in the experiment as a chain of quantum dots in a GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure, the error of the transfer operation is probed by charge counting. Error rates for extra ($P_+$) or missing ($P_-$) electrons of the electron shuttle are measured to $P_{-}=(6.92 \pm 0.14) \times 10^{-5}$ and $P_{+}=(2.13 \pm 0.08)\times 10^{-5}$ with uncertainty due to correlated noise in the environment. Furthermore, precise control over the timing of the random walk allows to explore the role of memory as the clock frequency is increased.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.