Paper detail

A Quantitative Perspective on Values of Domain Knowledge for Machine Learning

With the exploding popularity of machine learning, domain knowledge in various forms has been playing a crucial role in improving the learning performance, especially when training data is limited. Nonetheless, there is little understanding of to what extent domain knowledge can affect a machine learning task from a quantitative perspective. To increase the transparency and rigorously explain the role of domain knowledge in machine learning, we study the problem of quantifying the values of domain knowledge in terms of its contribution to the learning performance in the context of informed machine learning. We propose a quantification method based on Shapley value that fairly attributes the overall learning performance improvement to different domain knowledge. We also present Monte-Carlo sampling to approximate the fair value of domain knowledge with a polynomial time complexity. We run experiments of injecting symbolic domain knowledge into semi-supervised learning tasks on both MNIST and CIFAR10 datasets, providing quantitative values of different symbolic knowledge and rigorously explaining how it affects the machine learning performance in terms of test accuracy.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.