Paper detail

A QoE Model in Point Cloud Video Streaming

Point cloud video has been widely used by augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) applications as it allows users to have an immersive experience of six degrees of freedom (6DoFs). Yet there is still a lack of research on quality of experience (QoE) model of point cloud video streaming, which cannot provide optimization metric for streaming systems. Besides, position and color information contained in each pixel of point cloud video, and viewport distance effect caused by 6DoFs viewing procedure make the traditional objective quality evaluation metric cannot be directly used in point cloud video streaming system. In this paper we first analyze the subjective and objective factors related to QoE model. Then an experimental system to simulate point cloud video streaming is setup and detailed subjective quality evaluation experiments are carried out. Based on collected mean opinion score (MOS) data, we propose a QoE model for point cloud video streaming. We also verify the model by actual subjective scoring, and the results show that the proposed QoE model can accurately reflect users' visual perception. We also make the experimental database public to promote the QoE research of point cloud video streaming.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.