Paper detail

A puzzle on isomeric configurations in and around $N=126$ closed shell

The puzzle of finding consistent nuclear configurations for explaining both the decay probabilities and moments of the ${9/2}^-$, ${8}^+$ and ${21/2}^-$ isomers in and around $N=126$ closed shell has been approached in the generalized seniority scheme. Though $h_{9/2}$ is the dominant orbital near Fermi energy, the role of configuration mixing from the surrounding $f_{7/2}$ and $i_{13/2}$ orbitals is found to be very important for the consistent explanation of all the isomeric properties such as the $B(E2)$ rates, $Q-$moments and $g-$factors. The structural behavior of the closed shell $N=126$ isotonic isomers turns out to be very similar to the $N=124$ and $N=128$ isotonic isomers which have two neutron-holes and two neutron-particles, respectively. This is due to the pairing symmetries of nuclear many-body Hamiltonian. As a confirmation, the microscopic shell model occupancies are also calculated for these isomers in $N=126$ chain which support the generalized seniority results. Additional arguments using the systematics of odd-proton ${9/2}^-$ states in Tl ($Z=81$), Bi ($Z=83$), At ($Z=85$) and Fr ($Z=87$) isotopes are also presented.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.