Paper detail

A projection operator approach to the Bose-Hubbard model

We develop a projection operator formalism for studying both the zero temperature equilibrium phase diagram and the non-equilibrium dynamics of the Bose-Hubbard model. Our work, which constitutes an extension of Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 106}, 095702 (2011), shows that the method provides an accurate description of the equilibrium zero temperature phase diagram of the Bose-Hubbard model for several lattices in two- and three-dimensions (2D and 3D). We show that the accuracy of this method increases with the coordination number $z_0$ of the lattice and reaches to within 0.5% of quantum Monte Carlo data for lattices with $z_0=6$. We compute the excitation spectra of the bosons using this method in the Mott and the superfluid phases and compare our results with mean-field theory. We also show that the same method may be used to analyze the non-equilibrium dynamics of the model both in the Mott phase and near the superfluid-insulator quantum critical point where the hopping amplitude $J$ and the on-site interaction $U$ satisfy $z_0J/U \ll 1$. In particular, we study the non-equilibrium dynamics of the model both subsequent to a sudden quench of the hopping amplitude $J$ and during a ramp from $J_i$ to $J_f$ characterized by a ramp time $τ$ and exponent $α$: $J(t)=J_i +(J_f-J_i) (t/τ)^α$. We compute the wavefunction overlap $F$, the residual energy $Q$, the superfluid order parameter $Δ(t)$, the equal-time order parameter correlation function $C(t)$, and the defect formation probability $P$ for the above-mentioned protocols and provide a comparison of our results to their mean-field counterparts. We find that $Q$, $F$, and $P$ do not exhibit the expected universal scaling. We explain this absence of universality and show that our results for linear ramps compare well with the recent experimental observations.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.