Paper detail

A probabilistic mechanics theory for random dynamics

This is a general description of a probabilistic formalism of mechanics, i.e., an extension of the Newtonian mechanics principles to the systems undergoing random motion. From an analysis of the induction procedure from experimental data to the Newtonian laws, it is shown that the experimental verification of Newton law in a random motion implies a stochastic extension of the virtual work principle and the least action principle, i.e., <dW>=0 and <dA>=0 averaged over all the random paths instead of dW=0 and dA=0 for single path in regular dynamics. A probabilistic mechanics is formulated and applied to thermodynamic system. Several known results, rules and principles can be reproduced and justified from this new point of view. To mention some, we have obtain the entropy variation of the free expansion of gas and heat conduction without considering local equilibrium, and a violation of the Liouville theorem and Poincaré recurrence theorem, which allows to relate the entropy production to the work performed by random forces in nonequilibrium process.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.