Paper detail

A principled stopping rule for importance sampling

Importance sampling (IS) is a Monte Carlo technique that relies on weighted samples, simulated from a proposal distribution, to estimate intractable integrals. The quality of the estimators improves with the number of samples. However, for achieving a desired quality of estimation, the required number of samples is unknown and depends on the quantity of interest, the estimator, and the chosen proposal. We present a sequential stopping rule that terminates simulation when the overall variability in estimation is relatively small. The proposed methodology closely connects to the idea of an effective sample size in IS and overcomes crucial shortcomings of existing metrics, e.g., it acknowledges multivariate estimation problems. Our stopping rule retains asymptotic guarantees and provides users a clear guideline on when to stop the simulation in IS.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.