Paper detail

A PRESS statistic for two-block partial least squares regression

Predictive modelling of multivariate data where both the covariates and responses are high-dimensional is becoming an increasingly popular task in many data mining applications. Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression often turns out to be a useful model in these situations since it performs dimensionality reduction by assuming the existence of a small number of latent factors that may explain the linear dependence between input and output. In practice, the number of latent factors to be retained, which controls the complexity of the model and its predictive ability, has to be carefully selected. Typically this is done by cross validating a performance measure, such as the predictive error. Although cross validation works well in many practical settings, it can be computationally expensive. Various extensions to PLS have also been proposed for regularising the PLS solution and performing simultaneous dimensionality reduction and variable selection, but these come at the expense of additional complexity parameters that also need to be tuned by cross-validation. In this paper we derive a computationally efficient alternative to leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV), a predicted sum of squares (PRESS) statistic for two-block PLS. We show that the PRESS is nearly identical to LOOCV but has the computational expense of only a single PLS model fit. Examples of the PRESS for selecting the number of latent factors and regularisation parameters are provided.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.