Paper detail

A Poisson process model for Monte Carlo

Simulating samples from arbitrary probability distributions is a major research program of statistical computing. Recent work has shown promise in an old idea, that sampling from a discrete distribution can be accomplished by perturbing and maximizing its mass function. Yet, it has not been clearly explained how this research project relates to more traditional ideas in the Monte Carlo literature. This chapter addresses that need by identifying a Poisson process model that unifies the perturbation and accept-reject views of Monte Carlo simulation. Many existing methods can be analyzed in this framework. The chapter reviews Poisson processes and defines a Poisson process model for Monte Carlo methods. This model is used to generalize the perturbation trick to infinite spaces by constructing Gumbel processes, random functions whose maxima are located at samples over infinite spaces. The model is also used to analyze A* sampling and OS*, two methods from distinct Monte Carlo families.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.