Paper detail

A perturbation theory for the Anderson model

Within the diagrammatic real time approach \cite{König96, Schoeller97}, the current across a quantum dot which is tunnel coupled to two leads at different chemical potentials is calculated by the use of two objects referred to as kernels. The stationary reduced density matrix of the quantum dot is determined by the use of the density matrix kernel, while the current kernel is used in a second step to determine the stationary current across the dot. If the tunneling Hamiltonian is multiplied by a coupling parameter ``w``, then everything, including the kernels, the stationary density matrix as well as the stationary current, can be viewed as a function of w. In the time space, and at every single and fixed time t, the kernels have the clear structure of a convergent power series in w. Refer to the coefficients of these power series as the orders of the kernels. It is intuitive to truncate the kernels at some finite order and to perform remaining calculations by the use of the corresponding approximate kernels. However, the quantities which actually appear in the calculations are not the kernels as a function of time but rather their Laplace transforms, and here only in the limit λ\to 0. The statement that even in this limit the structure of a convergent power series in the coupling parameter is still conserved is shown in the text. The statement that the stationary density matrix and current are still analytic in the coupling parameter is shown, assuming the quantum dot is the single impurity Anderson model (SIAM). Finally, results for the kernels up to sixth order, neglecting the doubly occupied state and assuming equal energies E_\uparrow= E_\downarrow, are presented and discussed. In case the degenerate level lies below the Fermi level, a zero bias resonance, getting more and more pronounced with decreasing temperature, is expected.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.