Paper detail

A Perfect Set of Reals with Finite Self-Information

We examine a definition of the mutual information of two reals proposed by Levin. The mutual information is I(X:Y)=log(sum(2^{K(s)-K^X(s)+K(t)-K^Y(t)-K(s,t)}, (s,t) pairs of finite binary strings), where K is the prefix-free Kolmogorov complexity. A real X is said to have finite self-information if I(X:X) is finite. We give a construction for a perfect Pi^0_1 set of reals with this property, which settles some open questions posed by Hirschfeldt and Weber. The construction produces a perfect set of reals with K(s)<= K^{A}(s)+f(s)+c for a certain constant c and for any given Delta^0_2 f with a particularly nice approximation and for a specific choice of f it can also be used to produce a perfect Pi^0_1 set of reals that are low for effective Hausdorff dimension and effective packing dimension. The construction can be further adapted to produce a single perfect set of reals that satisfy K(s) <= K^A(s)+f(s)+c_f, where c_f is a constant that depends on f, for all f in a `nice' class of Delta^0_2 functions which includes all recursive orders.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.