Paper detail

A peculiar property of SUSY amplitudes at high energy

We observe that the electroweak one loop correction to the quark+gluon to quark+Higgs amplitude at high energy involves both single and quadratic logarithms of the energy in the SM case but only quadratic logarithms in the MSSM case. We explore the origin of this special SUSY cancellation, both in a diagrammatic way and through the splitting+Parameter Renormalization procedure. We show that it is not an accident but a remarkableand general SUSY property of the renormalized Higgs-fermion-fermion and Higgsino-sfermion-fermion vertices which directly reflects in such processes, for example in $bg\to tH^-$, $bg\to bH^0$, $bg\to bh^0$, $bg\to bA^0$, and through equivalence in $bg\to tW^-_{long}$, $bg\to bZ_{long}$, as well as in $bg\to \tilde{t}χ^-$, $bg\to\tilde{b}χ^0$. This simplification of the high energy behaviour (which only leaves quadratic logarithms involving pure gauge couplings without any free parameter) allows to write simple relations among these various processes which constitute genuine tests of the assumed SUSY model.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.