Paper detail

A Paradigm for Channel Assignment and Data Migration in Distributed Systems

In this manuscript, we consider the problems of channel assignment in wireless networks and data migration in heterogeneous storage systems. We show that a soft edge coloring approach to both problems gives rigorous approximation guarantees. In the channel assignment problem arising in wireless networks a pair of edges incident to a vertex are said to be conflicting if the channels assigned to them are the same. Our goal is to assign channels (color edges) so that the number of conflicts is minimized. The problem is NP-hard by a reduction from Edge coloring and we present two combinatorial algorithms for this case. The first algorithm is based on a distributed greedy method and gives a solution with at most $2(1-\frac{1}{k})|E|$ more conflicts than the optimal solution.The approximation ratio if the second algorithm is $1 + \frac{|V|}{|E|}$, which gives a ($1 + o(1)$)-factor for dense graphs and is the best possible unless P = NP. We also consider the data migration problem in heterogeneous storage systems. In such systems, data layouts may need to be reconfigured over time for load balancing or in the event of system failure/upgrades. It is critical to migrate data to their target locations as quickly as possible to obtain the best performance of the system. Most of the previous results on data migration assume that each storage node can perform only one data transfer at a time. However, storage devices tend to have heterogeneous capabilities as devices may be added over time due to storage demand increase. We develop algorithms to minimize the data migration time. We show that it is possible to find an optimal migration schedule when all $c_v$'s are even. Furthermore, though the problem is NP-hard in general, we give an efficient soft edge coloring algorithm that offers a rigorous $(1 + o(1))$-approximation guarantee.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.