Paper detail

A Novel Solution for Resonant Scattering Using Self-Consistent Boundary Conditions

We present two novel additions to the semi-analytic solution of Lyman $α$ (Ly$α$) radiative transfer in spherical geometry: (1) implementation of the correct boundary condition for a steady source, and (2) solution of the time-dependent problem for an impulsive source. For the steady-state problem, the solution can be represented as a sum of two terms: a previously-known analytic solution of the equation with mean intensity $J=0$ at the surface, and a novel, semi-analytic solution which enforces the correct boundary condition of zero-ingoing intensity at the surface. This solution is compared to that of the Monte Carlo method, which is valid at arbitrary optical depth. It is shown that the size of the correction is of order unity when the spectral peaks approach the Doppler core and decreases slowly with line center optical depth, specifically as $(a τ_0)^{-1/3}$, which may explain discrepancies seen in previous studies. For the impulsive problem, the time, spatial, and frequency dependence of the solution are expressed using an eigenfunction expansion in order to characterize the escape time distribution and emergent spectra of photons. It is shown that the lowest-order eigenfrequency agrees well with the decay rate found in the Monte Carlo escape time distribution at sufficiently large line-center optical depths. The characterization of the escape-time distribution highlights the potential for a Monte Carlo acceleration method, which would sample photon escape properties from distributions rather than calculating every photon scattering, thereby reducing computational demand.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.