Paper detail

A novel difference between strong liquids and fragile liquids in their dynamics near the glass transition

The systematic method to explore how the dynamics of strong liquids (S) is different from that of fragile liquids (F) near the glass transition is proposed from a unified point of view based on the mean-field theory discussed recently by Tokuyama. The extensive molecular-dynamics simulations are performed on different glass-forming materials. The simulation results for the mean-$n$th displacement $M_n(t)$ are then analyzed from the unified point of view, where $n$ is an even number. Thus, it is first shown that in each type of liquids there exists a master curve $H_n^{(i)}$ as $M_n(t)=R^nH_n^{(i)}(v_{th}t/R;D/Rv_{th})$ onto which any simulation results collapse at the same value of $D/Rv_{th}$, where $R$ is a characteristic length such as an interatomic distance, $D$ a long-time self-diffusion coefficient, $v_{th}$ a thermal velocity, and $i=$F and S. The master curves $H_n^{(F)}$ and $H_n^{(S)}$ are then shown not to coincide with each other in the so-called cage region even at the same value of $D/Rv_{th}$. Thus, it is emphasized that the dynamics of strong liquids is quite different from that of fragile liquids. A new type of strong liquids recently proposed is also tested systematically from this unified point of view. The dynamics of a new type is then shown to be different from that of well-known network glass formers in the cage region, although both liquids are classified as a strong liquid. Thus, it is suggested that a smaller grouping is further needed in strong liquids, depending on whether they have a network or not.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.