Paper detail

A novel approach to quantify the structural distortions of U/Th snub-disphenoids and their role in zircon to reidite type phase transitions of uranothorite

Our density functional study reveals a peculiar relation between the normalized Th content i.e. Th/(U+Th) and the hydrostatic pressure enforcing zircon to reidite type transition in uranothorite solid solution. We found that the transition pressure exhibits a minimum when Th/(U+Th) = 0.50 i.e. when the unit cell contains equal amount of U and Th. Any change in normalized Th content, as we move towards the U and Th end-members of the series, shows a significant jump in zircon-reidite transition pressure. In order to explain this behavior, we proposed a novel method of quantifying the distortions of U/Th-coordination polyhedra which manifest themselves as a triangular dodecahedron or snub-disphenoid. We have theoretically defined two parameters: one related to the two geometrically different U/Th-O bond lengths, having a fixed ratio between them for regular triangular dodecahedra irrespective of the volume and the other with three kinds of O-U-O and O-Th-O bond angles with multiplicities of 2, 4 and 12, respectively. The bond angle distortion for both U and Th-polyhedra were found to show a maximum in zircon phase and a minimum in reidite phase corresponding to Th/(U+Th) = 0.5. Since, the difference in angular distortion is minimum in case of Th/(U+Th) = 0.5, a lesser hydrostatic pressure is capable of triggering the transition, compared to the other members of this series. The bond length distortion is also characterized by a maximum in the reidite phase at the equal concentration of U and Th. Our finding is also complemented by the minimum compressibility observed in the zircon phase when the atomic percentage of U and Th are equal.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.