Paper detail

A note on the order of the Schur multiplier of p-groups

Let $G$ be a finite $p$-group of order $p^n$ with $|G'| = p^k$. Let $M(G)$ denotes the Schur multiplier of $G$. A classical result of Green states that $|M(G)| \leq p^{\frac{1}{2}n(n-1)}$. In 2009, Niroomand, improving Green's and other bounds on $|M(G)|$ for a non-abelain $p$-group $G$, proved that $|M(G)| \leq p^{\frac{1}{2}(n-k-1)(n+k-2)+1}$. In this article we note that a bound, obtained earlier, by Ellis and Weigold is more general than the bound of Niroomand. We derive from the bound of Ellis and Weigold that $|M(G)| \leq p^{\frac{1}{2}(d(G)-1)(n+k-2)+1}$ for a non-abelain $p$-group $G$. Moreover, we sharpen the bound of Ellis and Weigold and as a consequence derive that if $G^{ab}$ is not homocyclic then $|M(G)| \leq p^{\frac{1}{2}(d(G)-1)(n+k-3)+1}$. We further note an improvement in an old bound given by Vermani. Finally we note, for a $p$-group of coclass $r$, that $|M(G)| \leq p^{\frac{1}{2}(r^2-r)+kr+1}$. This improves a bound by Moravec.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.