Paper detail

A note on the existence of U-cyclic elements in periodic Floer homology

Edtmair-Hutchings have recently defined, using periodic Floer homology, a U-cycle property for Hamiltonian isotopy classes of area-preserving diffeomorphisms of closed surfaces. They show that every Hamiltonian isotopy class satisfying the U-cycle property satisfies the smooth closing lemma and also satisfies a kind of Weyl law involving the actions of certain periodic points; they show that every rational isotopy class on the two-torus satisfies the U-cycle property. It seems that in general, not much is known about the U-module structure on PFH. Here we consider a version of Seiberg-Witten-Floer cohomology which is known by the work of Lee-Taubes to be isomorphic, as a U-module, to the periodic Floer homology in sufficiently high degree. We show that the analogous U-cycle property holds for every rational Hamiltonian isotopy class on any closed surface and, more generally, for any non-torsion spin-c structure. On the other hand, we also show that a rational isotopy class may contain elements that are not U-cyclic. By the Lee-Taubes isomorphism, the same results hold for PFH. Our results are some of the first computations concerning the U-module structure on these theories.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.