Paper detail

A non-commutative Beurling's theorem with respect to unitarily invariant norms

In 1967, Arveson invented a non-commutative generalization of classical $H^{\infty},$ known as finite maximal subdiagonal subalgebras, for a finite von Neumann algebra $\mathcal M$ with a faithful normal tracial state $τ$. In 2008, Blecher and Labuschagne proved a version of Beurling's theorem on $H^\infty$-right invariant subspaces in a non-commutative $L^{p}(\mathcal M,τ)$ space for $1\le p\le \infty$. In the present paper, we define and study a class of norms ${\mathcal{N}}_{c}(\mathcal M, τ)$ on $\mathcal{M},$ called normalized, unitarily invariant, $\Vert \cdot \Vert_{1}$-dominating, continuous norms, which properly contains the class $\{ \Vert \cdot \Vert_{p}:1\leq p< \infty \}.$ For $α\in \mathcal{N}_{c}(\mathcal M, τ),$ we define a non-commutative $L^{α}({\mathcal{M}},τ)$ space and a non-commutative $H^α$ space. Then we obtain a version of the Blecher-Labuschagne-Beurling invariant subspace theorem on $H^\infty$-right invariant subspaces in a non-commutative $L^{α}({\mathcal{M}},τ)$ space. Key ingredients in the proof of our main result include a characterization theorem of $H^α$ and a density theorem for $L^α(\mathcal M,τ)$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.