Paper detail

A New Weighted Spearman's Footrule as A Measure of Distance between Rankings

Many applications motivate the distance measure between rankings, such as comparing top-k lists and rank aggregation for voting, and intrigue great interest to researchers. For example, for a search engine, the use of different ranking algorithms may return different ranking lists. The effect of a ranking algorithm can be estimated by computing the distance (similarity) between the result ranking it returns and the appropriate ranking people expect. People may be interested in only the first few items of result ranking, therefore the metric for measuring the distance should emphasize on the items in higher positions. Besides, in an extreme case, if a result ranking is the total reverse of the expected ranking, then it is considered to be the worst ranking with the maximum distance. Therefore, a metric is called for, which can satisfy both of the two intuitions. To address this problem, we present a weighted metric based on the classical Spearman's footrule metric to measure the distance between two permutations of n objects. This metric can be applied in rank aggregation problem with a polynomial time algorithm, and produces a 2-approximation for adopting the weighted Kendall's tau distance proposed by Farnoud et al.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.