Paper detail

A new preferential model with homophily for recommender systems

"Rich-get-richer" and "homophily" are two important phenomena in evolving social networks. "Rich-get-richer" means people with higher followings are more likely to attract new fans, and "homophily" means people prefer to bond with others of the same social group or who have some other attribute in common. To formalize the phenomena simultaneously in the context of an evolving social network, we consider a K-groups preferential attachment (KPA) network model, which is helpful for the social networks recommender system. The main contribution of this paper is to propose a new evolving social network model with the mechanisms of rich-get-richer and homophily. We show that the KPA model exhibits a power-law degree distribution for each group and prove the central limit theorem (CLT) for the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of the parameters in the KPA model. We illustrate our results through simulated data and explore the usage of this model with real data examples.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.