Paper detail

A new obstruction to the extension problem for Sobolev maps between manifolds

The main result of the present paper, combined with earlier results of Hardt and Lin settles the extension problem for $W^{1,p}(\mathcal M, \mathcal N)$, where $\mathcal M$ and $\mathcal N$ are compact riemannian manfolds, $\mathcal M$ having non-empty smooth boundary and assuming moreover that $\mathcal N$ is simply connected. The main question which is studied is the following: Given a map in the trace space $W^{1-\frac{1}{p}, p} (\partial \mathcal M, \mathcal N)$, does it possess an extension in $W^{1,p}(\mathcal M, \mathcal N)$? We show that the answer is negative in the case $\mathfrak p_{c} +1\leq p<m={\rm dim} \, \mathcal M$, where the number $\mathfrak p_{c}$ is related to the topology of $\mathcal N$. We also adress the case $\mathcal N$ is not simply connected, providing various results and rising some open questions. In particular, we stress in that case the relationship between the extension problem and the lifting problem to the universal covering manifold.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.