Paper detail

A new method to obtain the Broad Line Region size of high redshift quasars

We present high S/N UV spectra for eight quasars at z $\sim$ 3 obtained with VLT/FORS. The spectra enable us to analyze in detail the strong and weak emission features in the rest-frame range 1300-2000 A of each source (Ciii]$λ$1909, Siiii]$λ$1892, Aliii$λ$1860, Siii$λ$1814, Civ$λ$1549 and blended Siiv$λ$1397+Oiv]$λ$1402). Flux ratios Aliii$λ$1860/Siiii]$λ$1892, Civ$λ$1549/Aliii$λ$1860, Siiv$λ$1397+Oiv]$λ$1402/Siiii]$λ$1892 and Siiv$λ$1397+Oiv]$λ$1402/Civ$λ$1549 strongly constrain ionizing photon flux and metallicity through the use of diagnostic maps built from CLOUDY simulations. The radius of the broad line region is then derived from the ionizing photon flux applying the definition of the ionization parameter. The rBLR estimate and the width of a virial component isolated in prominent UV lines yields an estimate of black hole mass. We compare our results with previous estimates obtained from the rBLR - luminosity correlation customarily employed to estimate black hole masses of high redshift quasars.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.