Paper detail

A new measure for assessment of clustering based on kernel density estimation

A new clustering accuracy measure is proposed to determine the unknown number of clusters and to assess the quality of clustering of a data set given in any dimensional space. Our validity index applies the classical nonparametric univariate kernel density estimation method to the interpoint distances computed between the members of data. Being based on interpoint distances, it is free of the curse of dimensionality and therefore efficiently computable for high-dimensional situations where the number of study variables can be larger than the sample size. The proposed measure is compatible with any clustering algorithm and with every kind of data set where the interpoint distance measure can be defined to have a density function. Simulation study proves its superiority over widely used cluster validity indices like the average silhouette width and the Dunn index, whereas its applicability is shown with respect to a high-dimensional Biostatistical study of Alon data set and a large Astrostatistical application of time series with light curves of new variable stars.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.