Paper detail

A New Fairness Model based on User's Objective for Multi-user Multi-processor Online Scheduling

Resources of a multi-user system in multi-processor online scheduling are shared by competing users in which fairness is a major performance criterion for resource allocation. Fairness ensures equality in resource sharing among the users. According to our knowledge, fairness based on the user's objective has neither been comprehensively studied nor a formal fairness model has been well defined in the literature. This motivates us to explore and define a new model to ensure algorithmic fairness with quantitative performance measures based on optimization of the user's objective. In this paper, we propose a new model for fairness in Multi-user Multi-processor Online Scheduling Problem(MUMPOSP). We introduce and formally define quantitative fairness measures based on user's objective by optimizing makespan for individual user in our proposed fairness model. We also define the unfairness of deprived users and absolute fairness of an algorithm. We obtain lower bound results for the absolute fairness for m identical machines with equal length jobs. We show that our proposed fairness model can serve as a framework for measuring algorithmic fairness by considering various optimality criteria such as flow time and sum of completion times.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.